That's my recollection..further there was discussion as to part of GMC 're consent and the consent "form" James Titcombe was also present
-
-
We all got teabagged by CQC NHS
-
ROFL!! Ok... now I see the connection.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
...must say though ....in last 18 months seen some hard hitting CQC reports..which made your meeting even more bemusing
-
Really? Anything in particular grab your attention that they've reported on? I am still flummoxed that our meeting didn't provoke a major reaction. But then it's not the only one.
-
Heavily critical of leadership nhs trust..heavily critical vulnerable children services..heavily critical of lack of care coordination and bunker mindset care both nhs and soc care..
-
Is this something to do with the review of regulators I've been hearing something about? Is everybody just 'toughening up' to avoid the criticism they know is coming?
-
Could be..but also a recognition that Public mood is not so passive when comes to poor services..and also of course is useful for “Providers” when pointing out paucity of resources especially dosh
-
We've definitely made it harder for them to hide. Twitter has played no small part in that. Hope that poor CQC reports aren't associated with more money? That would be a perverse incentive indeed!
-
Some will be..but poor leadership ain’t nor uncoordinated care..and seen CQC reports that highlight atrocious practice...both within public and private sector
-
Always thought most CQC reports which found nothing were most likely as a result of not looking/choosing not to see. I wonder what's changed, if you're saying they are now?
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
...bloody teABAGS
.. -
What have they ever done for us..?
-
Partial to a cuppa
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
