Clinicians often have very different opinions ,so do families . To those dedicated to finding solutions to the many issues raised repeatedly, there will be/are solutions. More care and respect to those bereaved by failings could be addressed swiftly and also WB protection.
Is that right? What is it do you think; damage limitation? Funny how joint enterprise only applies in certain circumstances...
-
-
He is also retiring early this month and court case is in the Spring. Wonder if he gets a pay off and gag.
-
Oh no. That doesn't make life any easier, does it? Means the GMC represents no threat for starters.
-
I tried years ago to get GMC to investigate. They asked the Trust, they said no issue, so he worked on unchallenged
-
And that is pretty much the story of GMC from every patient/family perspective. Unless they're from abroad or a whistleblower. Same for PHSO - they just take the trust's word.
-
Had no involvement with GMC, so know very little about them.
-
You've not missed much, tbh. Think same end result, different badge. :)
-
Still lots of people making positive changes, needed for people who will continue to use service.
-
The changes we need have been clear since Francis recommended them tbh. Single regulator, (no more 'not in our remit' brush-offs), and an individual statutory duty of candour. Until we sort those out & secure med records, changes will only ever be superficial.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.