Brain surgeon Henry Marsh defends the consultant who left his initials on a patient's liverhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/dec/15/doctor-signed-patients-livers-law-courts …
-
-
Replying to @ButlerKatherine
And you published it. Extraordinary. I thought better of your organisation for health coverage. This is beyond disappointing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
Isn't it important to know how somebody in the profession views it, even if you disagree with his conclusion?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ButlerKatherine
John Clarke Retweeted Shaun Lintern
From a personal perspective, I think there is danger in offering a platform for views which attempt to diminish the lawful right to informed consent. Esp by a publication so widely read in the medical community. Protecting consent is hard enough already. >https://twitter.com/shaunlintern/status/600735704101031936 …
John Clarke added,
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
I don't think HM is attempting to diminish the right to consent. He tries to explain why a surgeon might have acted in this way but notes the man was silly
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"The surgeon who signed patients’ livers was silly, not criminal. The law is an ass" > That's your headline. And you don't think this in any way attempts to diminish the legal right to consent? Really?? I do.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.