@drcmday watched GMC v Bawa-Garba in High Court and has written a blog about the way the GMC chose to argue the case against a junior doctor convicted of manslaughter for a medical error in the context of multiple system failures & errors from other staff
http://54000doctors.org/blogs/whose-interests-are-the-gmc-really-trying-to-serve-in-the-bawa-garba-case.html …
-
-
Replying to @54kdoctors @drcmday
Quick point: No mention of mistakenly stopping CPR? Longer point: GMC have no influence over Dr
#BawaGarba's lawyers, so surely all this mitigation will have been raised in her defence during original trial? Were the jury just unmoved?5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @54kdoctors
John I think this FB post from a consultant more knowledgeable that me about the
#BawaGarba case answers your other questions. I love the last point she makes about the timing of the reduction in fees.pic.twitter.com/DzVBYdMQUz
1 reply 4 retweets 3 likes
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
Yes, I noticed the fee change timing too. https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/940922429232353281 … Do those comments relate to the appeal, or the original trial? Did anyone attend the original trial?
John Clarke added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.