Wigan introduced Consultant case note review of all 'unexpected deaths' also, which is a good thing. Unsure if this is wildly different from other DGHs.
-
-
Replying to @drbenwhite @juniordrblog and
Also introduced 300 patient safety champions and 50 Dementia champions and weekly
#Governance meeting where MD Chairs and discusses openly complaints, litigation SUI, clinical incidents anyone raising concerns openly learns lessons. Removed culture of naming, shaming bullying2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu @drbenwhite and
After years of studying every CQC board meeting, I stopped watching just a few months before that one. Decided I'd suffered enough! But it was worth enduring another to watch that - compelling viewing and the headline figures appear hard to ignore. Impressive at first glance. >>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu and
May I ask a couple of question on the weekly death reports please? (Are you still doing them btw?) You exclude from investigation: > Pts admitted to die > Pts admitted to ITU > Pts put on the dying pathway Why this last group? How many are excluded because of that factor alone?
3 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @drbenwhite and
In theory death review is good only if it is done properly and with
#Candour and full engagement of families.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu @drbenwhite and
Absolutely. I appreciate that. My question is more to do which cases you include for review - and specifically why you choose to exclude those placed on the death pathway.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @drbenwhite and
1 Unexpected death 2 Family unhappy or has concerns 3 Death which should be referred to
#Coroner and any one has any concerns This is my personal view@martinfarrier is an expert1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu @drbenwhite and
Ok, thanks Umesh. Wonder if
@martinfarrier will have any thoughts on this question? The point was discussed at CQC's board meeting just 10m15s into the video >https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fxh95M_85PM …4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu and
The crucial step that allows candour is immediacy. We do the reviews the week the patient dies. No reopening of wounds.
1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @martinfarrier @DrUmeshPrabhu and
And I absolutely applaud you for this. Speed is of the essence. A family's desire for answers can leave their imagination to eat away at them over time. How soon do you share findings with the families?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
...and thank you Martin, for taking the time to respond. Much appreciated.
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY @DrUmeshPrabhu
The first part of the conversation can happen in days. Later parts vary. The first contact is the essential one.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.