Parents face legal battle with hospital to keep baby son alive http://dailym.ai/2AFNWfg this is happening far too much @C7RKY @JadeTaylor8 @Nolliag66
-
-
Sounds like they don't have a clue.... And worried they'll be exposed by abroad treatment. Alternative medicine is defined as fake news to them
-
it is a hospital with a bad reputation and it has earned it and worse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Our children are not ours. The Children's Act gave them to the State.
-
Yes, I've noticed that act being quoted, using the 'protection of children's rights' as justification. Protection from their parents, being the implication. Justification being for riding roughshod over their views. Scary times.
-
We live or die based on the values and beliefs of those who treat ushttps://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/nov/10/isaiah-haastrup-father-banned-kings-college-hospital-treating-brain-damaged-son-court-told …
-
I saw that at the time. Made my antenna twitch. NHS constitution only permits denying access to services for 2 reasons: 1 If you're abusive 2 If you're vexatious All too often trusts will manufacture a case of this sort to exclude anyone too 'awkward'. Complainants especially.
-
There was a time when hospitals were proud of saving children.
-
I've been sat here trying to work out what I can even say to that. I got nothing...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.