She doesn't know your story or fight for Robbie. I learned of it & have followed developments, due to my bro-in-law & your friend Kevin Bedford. Will you can see her agenda from her last tweet, she's trying to get you "on side" by tying your tragedy to antivaxxing. My apologies
-
-
Replying to @NiamhNolan8 @Charbrevolution and
Hi, thank you. Please pass on my best wishes to Kevin, Clodagh and the children.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @willcpowell @Charbrevolution and
Will do! Thanks, & again my apologies for her behaviour & trying to hijack your story there. Keep up the good fight xx
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Try as I might, (and I really *did* try), I don't feel like I can let this thread go by on my timeline without comment. First things first,
@Charbrevolution: No, it isn't polite to chase someone onto another thread like that. Especially such a serious one as this. >>2 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @NiamhNolan8 and
>>Doing so is only likely to undermine any point you're trying to make anyway and if you believe your child has been damaged by a vaccine, then your voice should be heard. Give yourself every chance. >>
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @NiamhNolan8 and
>>But that said,
@niamhnolan8, you could learn a lot from@willcpowell's response to this 'intrusion'. I don't know if you're a HCP or just have an interest in healthcare, but compassion goes a long way. A little more on your part here would not be entirely out of place. >>2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @NiamhNolan8 and
John Clarke Retweeted Niamh Nolan
>>And I have to say, I always find I 'bristle' at tweets like this. > https://twitter.com/niamhnolan8/status/937379866588188673 … What 'science' is it you think is being denied? This science? > http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/science-and-technology-committee/research-integrity/written/68813.html …
John Clarke added,
Niamh Nolan @NiamhNolan8Replying to @willcpowell @Charbrevolution and 4 othersSorry for the hijacker, Will. She's a science-denier & promotes dangerous MMS "cures" people & she's following me about here attempting to harass
Hence her comment on my twt. She has autistic children but wants ppl to believe they were made autistic by childhood inoculations1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @NiamhNolan8 and
Or this science? > "Only 7% of more than 60,000 clinical studies analysed passed criteria of being high quality and clinically relevant to patients"https://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2017/nov/21/finance-trumps-patients-uk-healthcare-needs-inquiry?CMP=ema-1700&CMP= …
3 replies 5 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @NiamhNolan8 and
Or maybe it's this 'science', where half the evidence is selectively hidden and we call what remains 'scientific'? http://www.alltrials.net/find-out-more/why-this-matters/ … I could go on. There is plenty of room for debate. END
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
TY, John. I agree with your point about Charisse's behaviour, following me here to harass. What's clear from reading your tweets after is you've never dealt with Charisse & behaviour she's guilty of towards myself & others. Welcome to read my time line & hers, to inform yourself
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
My point about Charisse's behaviour was made to Charisse. But there's a notable lack of reference here to the points made about your own behaviour. Reflection time, methinks...
-
-
Because my you're judging my behaviour out of context. My behaviour is warranted, if you care to read my timeline & hers, you'll see that. I'm being a lot more civilised towards Charisse than she deserves. You can reflect on your own judgements made here then, John :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Own it Niamh....reflect.....
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.