@BedfordClo Familiar with your story & fight, Will 
-
-
>>And I have to say, I always find I 'bristle' at tweets like this. > https://twitter.com/niamhnolan8/status/937379866588188673 … What 'science' is it you think is being denied? This science? > http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/science-and-technology-committee/research-integrity/written/68813.html …
-
Or this science? > "Only 7% of more than 60,000 clinical studies analysed passed criteria of being high quality and clinically relevant to patients"https://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2017/nov/21/finance-trumps-patients-uk-healthcare-needs-inquiry?CMP=ema-1700&CMP= …
-
Great article.
-
Isn't it just? Prompted me to do a mini-thread when I first found it >https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/933433781318537219 …
-
Medical research is my day job. Sorry to say it rings true.
-
How interesting to hear you say that - thank you. I just found myself with cause to go looking for the science, (which I believed in), only to find there really wasn't a whole lot that would qualify as such in the medical field. Pharma especially so.
-
The problem is that people assume science is a truth-seeking machine. Actually it is a consensus-building machine. They are very different.
-
If I could frame that tweet, I would. Beautifully put. Call me old-fashioned, but I never regarded consensus alone as science at all. I recall the maths version: 1+1=3 because enough of us say so? Yeah...right!
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
A voice of measured compassion....
-
Ppl w/genuine complaints & concerns re medicine & HC always deserve compassion, like Will & many more I've aware of, & have cared for. Hoping John'll remember in future that ppl w/a sinister agenda, guilty of false claims harassment & doxxing of ppl they don't agree w/ exist too
-
Well, you can hope if you wish, but let me tell you what I'm more likely to remember, shall I? I'll remember the day you both came crashing onto my timeline for sure, distracting debate away from arguably one of the most important health topics of the day. >>
-
>> I'll remember you proudly quoting 'science' as your justification for ridiculing another person's view, whilst being totally unwilling to acknowledge evidence which shows how utterly bereft of credibility the so-called 'science' you rely on, truly is. >>
-
>> Even in today's news, there's reason to ask questions. >https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5133049/amp/Aluminium-vaccines-cause-autism.html …
-
>> But above all, I'll remember how you engaged in this whole debate without ever establishing that I too believe wholeheartedly my child was severely damaged by a vaccine. Now...for the love of God, please do go and reflect on that. But not on my timeline. Thank you.
-
I can see this is now about you, for you, & her, for her. This isn't your thread nor timeline. I made a personal comment addressed to Will. Charisse followed me here to attack, & you involved yourself, opining on a situation you're not part of. Pls reflect on your poor behaviour.
-
*MY* poor behaviour? You're utterly shameless. It's there for all to judge. Goodbye...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Hence her comment on my twt. She has autistic children but wants ppl to believe they were made autistic by childhood inoculations