Unless there are convincing reasons not to discuss it. Then they must be documented.https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/698874198190649345 …
-
-
@C7RKY@katemasters67 But creates situation where "easiest path" is to decide "for CPR" if staff too pressed for time to discuss every case -
@jim_crawfurd@katemasters67 Time is a whole other debate. But taking 'easiest' option if it's not in pt's best interests sounds dodgy to me -
@C7RKY@katemasters67 Agreed, but depends what harm may come to other patients if you spend a long time on the discussion. Genuinely. -
@jim_crawfurd@katemasters67 Back to time again & so to#safestaffing. Nobody wants doctors to have to choose which pt they must let down! -
@C7RKY@jim_crawfurd this is a matter of patient safety and should be reported to managers IMO. It's a terror situation to place doctors in. -
@C7RKY@jim_crawfurd (terrible even.) -
Tweet unavailable
-
@billdossett@C7RKY@jim_crawfurd@DailyMirror I know, they all break my heart. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY@katemasters67 current legal position requires discussion if deciding" not for" but not if deciding "for". Rather illogical.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.