@C7RKY @Neuro_Skeptic we might not fully understand what the mechanism is doesn't mean we can't know the drug to be (relatively) safe 2/2
-
-
Replying to @hisotalus
@HannaIsotalus
@Neuro_Skeptic I'm afraid I've a real problem with the so-called 'scientific' underpinnings of our safety/efficacy evidence >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY @HannaIsotalus@Neuro_Skeptic I'm a fan of science but from what I've learned, I see v little scientific about the process at all tbh2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @hisotalus
@HannaIsotalus
@Neuro_Skeptic Sure. There are just too many weaknesses for me, any one of which may be enough to produce erroneous results >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@HannaIsotalus
@Neuro_Skeptic 1 Trial design limitations 2 Changing outcomes measured post-trial 3 Unconscious bias 4 Peer review failings >1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@HannaIsotalus
@Neuro_Skeptic 5 Failure to register trials 6 Failure to publish trials That last one alone is sufficient, imho Any thoughts?6 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@Neuro_Skeptic Thanks! These are def big worries. For clinical trials 5 is now mandatory, but results may still not be reported 1/n1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @hisotalus
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
@HannaIsotalus
@Neuro_Skeptic Well, you say 5 is mandatory, but... https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/691342320906719232 … Telling them they must, doesn't guarantee it.John Clarke added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@Neuro_Skeptic I know very little about this. I though you couldn't get ethical approval without registering in the UK1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@HannaIsotalus @Neuro_Skeptic This is an industry that's made an art form out of skirting around the rules. Some things don't change, sadly.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.