@C7RKY @katemasters67 @PhyllisStein2 @follyscorner @jim_crawfurd @retiredbrain @lauradonnlee 30 people with no vested interest agree. Why?
-
-
@C7RKY@follyscorner@katemasters67@PhyllisStein2@jim_crawfurd@retiredbrain That can't be based on conviction all NHS staff are amoral -
@JFr4ser@follyscorner@katemasters67@PhyllisStein2@jim_crawfurd@retiredbrain No. It's based on a regulatory obligation to mitigate risk. -
@C7RKY@follyscorner@katemasters67@PhyllisStein2@jim_crawfurd@retiredbrain Calculation of risk must be proportionate to strike balance -
@JFr4ser@follyscorner@katemasters67@PhyllisStein2@jim_crawfurd@retiredbrain Agree. I'd rank fraudulent med records v high on that scale -
@C7RKY@follyscorner@katemasters67@PhyllisStein2@jim_crawfurd@retiredbrain equally I'd reason they don't give a complete picture of care
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.