@JamesTitcombe & @ShaunLintern have responded negatively to my open letter to Jeremy Hunt. Happy to receive negative or positive responses!
-
-
Replying to @willcpowell
@willcpowell@ShaunLintern I agree with need to address system gap re historical cases - I don't agree with criticisms of JH or approach.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @JamesTitcombe
@JamesTitcombe@ShaunLintern You wouldn't criticise Mr Hunt because he has delivered for you. The point is he doesn't deliver for others!1 reply 7 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @willcpowell
@willcpowell@ShaunLintern you & I are part of an expert advisory group JH established to make difference -more 2 do -need to work together.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JamesTitcombe
@JamesTitcombe@willcpowell@ShaunLintern One that JH has asked to focus on maternity incidents in its 1st year.http://www.hsj.co.uk/topics/policy-and-regulation/new-patient-safety-body-to-focus-on-maternity-care/7000172.article …1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@willcpowell@JamesTitcombe@ShaunLintern that's a worry. Will def test the 'without fear or favour' claim of IPSIS1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
@katemasters67@willcpowell@JamesTitcombe@ShaunLintern Understanding JH's presumably evidence-based reason for focus on maternity may help1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@willcpowell@JamesTitcombe@ShaunLintern evidence for all areas of healthcare just as strong. There must be a mix-for max learning.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@katemasters67 @willcpowell @JamesTitcombe @ShaunLintern Appreciated
I'd at least expect to see risk-based rationale for any suggested focus
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.