I've never seen an organisation try to squirm out of a FOI request by trying to answer it 'offline' before. Telling!https://twitter.com/drjonesaa/status/664067497193291776 …
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@drjonesaa PHSO does it. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/avoidance_of_replying_to_request#comment-60886 …1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jatroa
@jatroa@drjonesaa Equally telling. That's more annotations than I've ever seen for a FOI request on WDTK. Quite a hot topic, clearly!1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@drjonesaa Anything embarrassing ..especially a Dame Julie Mellor request.. Gets bounced to yr home address.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jatroa
@jatroa@drjonesaa So Freedom of Information not quite so freely available to all that way then? They must think we're completely daft.1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@drjonesaa PHSO Number 1 criteria is reputational defence. So desperate - it's heavily influencing FOIA requests2 replies 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @jatroa
@jatroa@C7RKY@drjonesaa LET NOT FOR GET BEHIND CLOSED DOORS COURT CASE#GMCUK THEY ALL IN THIS TOGETHER AND WE HAVE BUSTED THEM ALL1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
@paulfitter @jatroa @drjonesaa Doesn't matter how strong our evidence, does it? Always reminds me of this character:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZYUppkYHtM …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.