@C7RKY @doctorcaldwell which is akin to demanding a non-indicated dangerous treatment, that we then must administer, under duress...
-
-
Replying to @jodyaberdein
@jodyaberdein@doctorcaldwell Why is it? This decision is the clinician's alone - as the law makes clear. On paper, pt has no influence here2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell I think it's a really good example of an unintended consequence.1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jodyaberdein
@jodyaberdein@doctorcaldwell Indeed. But an Unintended consequence because of inability to communicate valid reasons for DNACPR. Needs work2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell Even better would be a society that recognised we all have to die...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jodyaberdein
@jodyaberdein@doctorcaldwell I think we know. We just don't want to feel like anyone has given up on us prematurely. That's the bottom line1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell I'm not sure the delicate art of medicine has been enhanced by a blanket legal requirement in this area.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @jodyaberdein
@jodyaberdein@doctorcaldwell The 'delicate art of medicine' is something I appreciate. Even regard with awe. But it's also riddled with >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@jodyaberdein@doctorcaldwell secrecy & a candour problem. This is just 1 of many attempts to demand it must change. Stems from there, imho.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell Yes, and 'we' have brought it on ourselves, with hubris, paternalism and arrogance.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
@jodyaberdein @doctorcaldwell You wouldn't be the first I'd heard suggest it. When reality is distorted, any solutions are similarly limited
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.