2/2 by ethical treatment I mean "right treatment for right indication, likely to work, and no futile suffering"https://twitter.com/K_G_Spearpoint/status/612203988218454016 …
-
-
Replying to @doctorcaldwell
@doctorcaldwell But yet again, this is OPINION. Opinion which pts have the right to debate. It's not an optional extra Gordon, it's the law.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell which will of course result in people like me fracturing more elderly sternums in vain. About which the law is silent3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @jodyaberdein
@jodyaberdein@doctorcaldwell That'll only happen if you fail to have the discussion though - which is all this is about. Why is it so hard?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell have you ever led on such a discussion out of interest?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jodyaberdein
@jodyaberdein@doctorcaldwell Not being a clinician, no. Familiar with coaching people to handle other such distressing conversations though2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell ...as a response to the realisation the end may be approaching (even distantly)1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@jodyaberdein @doctorcaldwell That, I completely understand. But you clearly have good clinical reasons for your decision. How to explain?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.