@drkimholt It's certainly a complex picture, which has been allowed to fester for far too long. Wonder how many 'risk of future harm' cases?
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@drkimholt Plus, I don't think it's as clear cut these days - have to weigh the risk of the state against the risk of the parents, frankly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drkimholt
@drkimholt That's just 1 critically flawed aspect of the state system tho, for me. Esp with dodgy experts thrown in. Risk just begins there.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY unless you work in the system too easy to believe what you read in the tabloids. Look at Baby P how wrong they got it#patientsafety1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drkimholt
@drkimholt I'd never form an opinion based on the tabloids. Baby P was terrible but I'd wager they get it wrong the other way more often tbh1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drkimholt
@C7RKY whole reason that I needed to speak out was to try and bring some truth into the equation - not sound bites1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drkimholt
@drkimholt Truth is a v rare commodity to find with Family Courts involved. Vast majority remains hidden, leaving parents vulnerable too.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@drkimholt Indeed. I think a few may need fumigating before the fresh air will work, but the principle is the right one. Transparency needed
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.