Now we're in small groups answering the question How would you reinvent pathology services to best meet patients' needs for the next 20 yrs?
@ilovepathology Which in turn may prove that clinical judgement had gone awry, or was even negligent? No wonder so few are being done now...
-
-
@C7RKY@ilovepathology one vital question I have for trust I deal with is the difference between their diagnosis and PM results..no answer -
@katemasters67 So what should the procedure be when that happens? If PM is 'gold standard' as@ilovepathology said, trust ought to explain. -
@C7RKY@ilovepathology they should..they have attempted to, using sections clipped from legal papers..but it doesn't answer my question. -
@katemasters67@ilovepathology So a failure to properly handle your complaint, one might say? Lot of that about... > http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/31697/Selected-summaries-of-investigations-by-PHSO-October-to-November-2014.pdf … -
@C7RKY the legal advice they took took precedence over advice of coroner, Legislative clarification note Francis recommendations... -
@katemasters67 So now they want to quote the law at you? Funny how they only ever do that when it suits them, eh? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/elder/8829350/Elderly-patients-condemned-to-early-death-by-secret-use-of-do-not-resuscitate-orders.html … -
@C7RKY they didn't quote it, just ignored it..hope to goodness same doesn't happen re outcome of case relating to DNACPR right to know -
@katemasters67 You and I both. We can't afford to accept the bland excuse of 'futile', or faux MH assessments tho, if it's not to be ignored - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.