@Cleverestcookie As ever, I suppose? Even the best systems can be rendered useless by those who run them. Sure yours is quality! Which one?
-
-
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie That's interesting. So what incentive is there for the most qualified (& presumably the busiest) to put themselves forward?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie Hardly sounds like the optimal set-up, considering importance. You'd think NICE would take an evidence-based look at that.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie I'm sure the criteria for inclusion is fine. I was thinking more about which candidates wouldn't be attracted to apply, tbh2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie Appreciated. Guess I'm being idealistic. If every clinician takes their lead from guidelines, best people should write them3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Cleverestcookie Too true. That expertise ought to extend to recognising that presence in a guideline, in no way implies consent too, ime.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.