@statsguyuk @Independent A systematic review of the trials that were published, perhaps. Who knows what we don't see?http://www.alltrials.net/find-out-more/why-this-matters/ …
@statsguyuk Not at all difficult. Esp with vaccines, which are expected to produce v rare adverse outliers. May only take 1 hidden trial..
-
-
@C7RKY There were over 800 SAEs in each of vaccine and control groups in the syst review. Would have to be a huge hidden trial! -
@statsguyuk I'm afraid I disagree. When considering the limitations of trials anyway (size/timescale/pre-selection) then the likelihood of > -
@statsguyuk an outlier showing up at all should be v slim for vaccines. Size of trial it shows up in is irrelevant. Just have to lose that 1 -
@C7RKY Sorry, but you're making no sense now. I suppose next you're going to tell me you're not anti-vaccine, but... right? -
@statsguyuk I'd prefer to stick to the debate at hand, than have you make the debate about me. So...which part doesn't make sense to you? -
@C7RKY Your previous 2 tweets -
@statsguyuk Something in particular? I didn't think it was overly-cryptic tbh.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.