@C7RKY @Independent Because the article is suggesting that the vaccine is the *cause* of the adverse events. Zero evidence for that.
@statsguyuk Show me evidence all trials are published & I'll accept safe & effective claims. Until such time, there's no evidence either way
-
-
@C7RKY Not all trials are published. But here's evidence that > 90% of pharma studies arehttp://bit.ly/1IMCMWfThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY And crucially, that syst review included > 40,000 patients. If other trials large enough to effect results had been done... -
@C7RKY ... they would be very difficult to hide -
@statsguyuk Not at all difficult. Esp with vaccines, which are expected to produce v rare adverse outliers. May only take 1 hidden trial.. -
@C7RKY There were over 800 SAEs in each of vaccine and control groups in the syst review. Would have to be a huge hidden trial! -
@statsguyuk I'm afraid I disagree. When considering the limitations of trials anyway (size/timescale/pre-selection) then the likelihood of > -
@statsguyuk an outlier showing up at all should be v slim for vaccines. Size of trial it shows up in is irrelevant. Just have to lose that 1 -
@C7RKY Sorry, but you're making no sense now. I suppose next you're going to tell me you're not anti-vaccine, but... right? -
@statsguyuk I'd prefer to stick to the debate at hand, than have you make the debate about me. So...which part doesn't make sense to you? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.