@C7RKY one with consent, one without! V.12 was not published until Dec.2009, so ALL uses of LCP before then were criminal assault!
-
-
-
@NHSNaziHunters A version with, and a version without consent? Not heard that said before. Thought it was claimed LCP requires no consent? -
@C7RKY ''reckless prescribing'' by GMC. This was IDENTICAL to treatment part of LCP v.11! -
@NHSNaziHunters Wow. Just shows you that it's impossible to just take a passing interest in such subjects. Every detail matters, clearly! -
@C7RKY DoH &Mike Richards are fully aware of what they are covering up John - its a coverup to avoid liability for HRA offences on massscale -
@NHSNaziHunters I have the same fear over the issue I've raised. I'm just not allowed to check medical records to find out for sure, sadly. -
@C7RKY is it a relative? There is a process whereby you can ask a judge to recognise you as an interested party in some circumstances.. -
@NHSNaziHunters No...I meant I'm not allowed to check everybody else's medical records. I already have what I need from our own. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY#Neuberger deliberately misled the public by saying she reviewed 'the liverpoolcarepathway', to obscure fact there were 2 versionsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY#NHSEngland are STILL distributing advance directives that say you CANNOT opt out of pain relief and sedation = total lie!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY they are covering up the fact that#LiverpoolCarePathway v.11 (which had lethal drugs as a treatment) had no consent process on it!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.