@KayFSheldon Easily avoided. Contrary to policy and the law. Individual staff again not getting EoLC right. Tragic for everyone.
-
-
Replying to @ShaunLintern
@ShaunLintern@SimonSimply@KayFSheldon /I never get it perfect, despite attempts, and so easy to criticise afar.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mgtmccartney
@mgtmccartney@ShaunLintern@SimonSimply@KayFSheldon shame it doesn't explain that families don't need to give 'permission' for a DNACPR2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @JoyWharton1
@JoyWharton1@mgtmccartney@SimonSimply@KayFSheldon Yes that was a shame. In answer to the coroner but could have been clearer.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ShaunLintern
@ShaunLintern@JoyWharton1@SimonSimply@KayFSheldon how much harm is the new guidance doing with ineffective harmful distressing CPR ?4 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @mgtmccartney
@mgtmccartney@JoyWharton1@SimonSimply@KayFSheldon How much distress is being avoided because difficult conversations are being had?4 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShaunLintern
@ShaunLintern@mgtmccartney@JoyWharton1@SimonSimply@KayFSheldon >>interruption re: binary CPR yes/no which shouldn't even be considered.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @elinlowri
@elinlowri What makes you say it shouldn't even be considered Elin? I'm just trying to understand the scenario you're thinking of here.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @elinlowri
@C7RKY But I do talk about it, because that is what is required.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@elinlowri I get that. Personally, I think it's an emotive one because it's a life/death choice that was being made w/o discussion too often
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.