Why do you bring people who have been exposed back to the UK @PHE_uk? If ebola is as dangerous as you suggest, why risk further spread?
-
-
Replying to @NHS_Analyst
@NHS_Analyst The survival of an individual must come 2nd to the potential spread, surely? But how does allowing travel reduce exposure?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NHS_Analyst
@NHS_Analyst So why not establish similar advanced facilities in the affected country, rather than allow possible disease to be transported?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NHS_Analyst
@NHS_Analyst So it's essentially a financial decision? The relative risk of infected travel is debatable point, but both options have a cost1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NHS_Analyst
@NHS_Analyst As I think I've suggested - I don't accept that it's less risky. I've seen no evidence to support that assertion Tom.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@NHS_Analyst Sorry, I mean risk of infecting others beyond the county already affected, would seem greater if transporting suspected victims
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.