@drpaulmorgan @silv24 Alltrials doesn't exclude vaccines, as I somehow suspect you already know. Doesn't have to be 50% to make a difference
-
-
Replying to @drpaulmorgan
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 No it doesn't. If you want to claim 'medical evidence' you'll get no objection from me. Just don't call it science.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @drpaulmorgan
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 No, it really isn't science, no matter how much you might like to wish it is. That, is my very point.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Sure it's science. Hypothesis, experiment, analysis, peer review, publish, lather, rinse, repeat.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BestInFlightLDJ
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Not if you selectively only publish the 50% of results that suit you. Esp when looking for outliers.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Once a vaccine manufacturer thinks it has a candidate, the FDA tracks every scrap of paper until market.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BestInFlightLDJ
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 The good old FDA? I'm not a fan tbh. Nor of the CDC. Pending#CDCwhistleblower will be interesting..2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 If you doubt everything, then you believe in nothing. Vaccines1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BestInFlightLDJ @drpaulmorgan @silv24 Could bore you for ages on why I now question all things medical (didn't used to). I have good reason
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.