@drpaulmorgan @silv24 And yet I know enough to know half of them are selectively hidden and that the process is unscientific as a result.
@drpaulmorgan @BestInFlightLDJ @silv24 But you are also unable to demonstrate that 100% of them have been published. So not science then...?
-
-
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Failures of entire vaccines are probably filed under "trade secrets." So what? -
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 The 'so what' is that we have no idea whether those vaccinations were brought to market or not. -
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Read my thread. Any vaccine that comes to market is documented alpha to omega. No data selectivity allowed. -
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 So explain the 'trade secrets' part to me then. How do you perceive that works? -
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 There are certain adjuvants & production methods not covered by patent that are trade secrets. FDA honors them -
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 And by 'honors them' you mean allows pharma to withold data on them? So what if those caused harm? -
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Methods and ingredients shared with FDA, not shared with public. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/27/health/27vaccine.html?pagewanted=print … -
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Interesting, thank you. Still relies on the FDA, which doesn't inspire me, but it's something. - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 Maybe not perfect science, but science nevertheless. Clinical trials are never absolute but use 1/2 -
@drpaulmorgan@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 I think this is the heart of where we disagree - 'not perfect science' just means not science for me. -
@C7RKY@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 In which case none of medicine is scientific. That’s utter hogwash. -
@drpaulmorgan@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 To a large extent, that's exactly the case, imho. Certainly when looking at many pharma products. -
@C7RKY@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 We’ll have to disagree, then. Ultimately, opinion without evidence is just opinion. -
@drpaulmorgan@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 I agree. And as we have no idea how much evidence is missing on vaccines, that cuts both ways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 2/2 statistical probability to say what works or what works better. Use 95% cut off (<95% = can’t be sure). -
@drpaulmorgan@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 And I do get that, but I'm sorry to say it again - that's only on the ones you get to find out about. -
@C7RKY@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 Yet to see any evidence of unpublished vaccine trial results.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.