@drpaulmorgan @silv24 Ha! You're making a claim that they're safe, when you have no idea what any unpublished studies may show. Correct?
@drpaulmorgan @silv24 No it doesn't. If you want to claim 'medical evidence' you'll get no objection from me. Just don't call it science.
-
-
-
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 No, it really isn't science, no matter how much you might like to wish it is. That, is my very point. -
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Sure it's science. Hypothesis, experiment, analysis, peer review, publish, lather, rinse, repeat. -
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Not if you selectively only publish the 50% of results that suit you. Esp when looking for outliers. -
@C7RKY@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 A claim for which there’s been no evidence presented to substantiate. -
@drpaulmorgan@BestInFlightLDJ@silv24 But you are also unable to demonstrate that 100% of them have been published. So not science then...? -
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Failures of entire vaccines are probably filed under "trade secrets." So what? -
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 The 'so what' is that we have no idea whether those vaccinations were brought to market or not. - 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.