@drpaulmorgan @silv24 What evidence is there that 100% have been published? Burden of proof lies with those claiming they're safe, imho.
@drpaulmorgan @silv24 And yet I know enough to know half of them are selectively hidden and that the process is unscientific as a result.
-
-
-
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Alltrials doesn't exclude vaccines, as I somehow suspect you already know. Doesn't have to be 50% to make a difference -
-
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 No it doesn't. If you want to claim 'medical evidence' you'll get no objection from me. Just don't call it science. -
-
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 No, it really isn't science, no matter how much you might like to wish it is. That, is my very point. -
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Sure it's science. Hypothesis, experiment, analysis, peer review, publish, lather, rinse, repeat. -
@BestInFlightLDJ@drpaulmorgan@silv24 Not if you selectively only publish the 50% of results that suit you. Esp when looking for outliers. - 18 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.