@drpaulmorgan @silv24 Not when you only decide to selectively publish half of the trials it isn't. That's decidedly unscientific, in fact.
@drpaulmorgan @silv24 You can't actually believe what you're shovelling here, surely? You think unpublished trials make no difference??
-
-
-
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 No they wouldn't. Esp for vaccines, which (hopefully) involves rare outliers. Lose a few selective trials, hey presto. -
@C7RKY@drpaulmorgan I ask again, would you vaccinate your children? -
@silv24@drpaulmorgan Yes, I did - as instructed (bullied) to do. Right up until the moment when the MMR brain-damaged my son. Now I don't. -
@C7RKY@silv24@drpaulmorgan we were advised by nurse against 2nd whooping cough after sons eyes swelled with first vaccine. -
@157Tracey@silv24@drpaulmorgan Blimey. That's actually the first time I've ever heard of somebody being told not to get a vaccine by a HCP -
Tweet unavailable
-
@jim_herd@157Tracey@silv24@drpaulmorgan I can feel the 'like buses' phrase coming on here. That makes you the 2nd person I know of then. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
-
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 They're not, but the Editor in Chief of the BMJ has confirmed that they make a difference when we *do* see them. -
-
@drpaulmorgan@silv24 "When you add together the published & unpublished evidence, you get a v diff pic of the quality & effectiveness.." > -
@drpaulmorgan As per the evidence to the committee...http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jan/03/drug-firms-information-clinical-trials … -
@C7RKY No, that’s a newspaper report not a scientific article. It’s not evidence that supports your claim of unpublished vaccine trials.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.