@Cleverestcookie @MatSilk I'm aware of that from my own research. But nobody inc GP we were begging for help raised it. How many don't know?
-
-
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie@MatSilk Agreed. But that there's a need for a plan, tells you it's not fit for purpose in making up for trial shortcomings2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie@MatSilk I'd have to agree. But my position is that we're being conned on both fronts. Half the studies & no fit safety net1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie@MatSilk I would entirely agree with that. But as neither is currently true, many blind claims of safety seem preposterous.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie@MatSilk That's fine as long as it's made clear what data wasn't available & don't claim it's scientific in any way. Alas..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Cleverestcookie @MatSilk Exactly. Esp important with vaccine outliers being hopefully rare, that makes it easy to hide problems. Just wrong
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.