How a major newspaper bungled a vaccine story, then smeared its critics, by @hiltzikm http://fw.to/u3Y97XZ @latimeshealth @juliaoftoronto
-
-
Replying to @picardonhealth
@picardonhealth@hiltzikm@latimeshealth@juliaoftoronto@JohnRLister "Vast library of scientific studies proving vaccine to be safe" Where?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@picardonhealth@hiltzikm@latimeshealth@juliaoftoronto@JohnRLister Read the story. 900,000 studied for negative effects. None.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Swift818
@Swift818@picardonhealth@hiltzikm@latimeshealth@juliaoftoronto@JohnRLister V good. Now tell me how many they studied but didn't publish1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@picardonhealth@hiltzikm@latimeshealth@juliaoftoronto@JohnRLister You're the one that says they "didn't publish." Prove it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Swift818
@Swift818@picardonhealth@hiltzikm@latimeshealth@juliaoftoronto@JohnRLister Only ones who must prove anything are those claiming these >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@Swift818@picardonhealth@hiltzikm@latimeshealth@juliaoftoronto@JohnRLister vaccines are safe. They can't do that 'scientifically' if >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Swift818 @picardonhealth @hiltzikm @latimeshealth @juliaoftoronto @JohnRLister selectively hiding half the evidence.http://www.alltrials.net/find-out-more/why-this-matters/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.