@Cleverestcookie I think most people just laughed when they heard 'Guardians' will be employed by trusts. Makes a farce of the report tbh.
-
-
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie Any position that's funded by the trust will be unreliable imho. Based upon the experiences of many. PALS being one example5 replies 4 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie I can only comment on my own experience, but PALS oft act as an early warning system for the trust. Knowledge was secondary4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@Cleverestcookie PALS totallyFAILED me at meeting after my bungled op &passed on false info to 'independent'counsellor so she hurt me1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @sillyoldjen
@sillyoldjen@Cleverestcookie I'm sorry to say I'm not surprised. 140 limitations don't permit me to express my full reservations about PALS2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@sillyoldjen it's a non-independent role often filled with people without the necessary skills and experience1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie@sillyoldjen I'm sure that's true. But they commonly only act as a means to gather info which helps prepare trust's defence2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@sillyoldjen well I'd only expect it to be a means of sourcing response from the trust to a query, not an independent investigation1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Cleverestcookie @sillyoldjen Oh no, there's no pretence of independence about it. This is often the forerunner to inform 'weeding/seeding'.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.