.@dbarthjones @kavitapmd 1 thing antiVaxers don't get wrong: if 50% studies go selectively unpublished, what remains is in no way 'science'.
>>@dbarthjones "When you add together published & unpublished evidence, you get a v diff pic of the quality & effectiveness of those drugs."
-
-
@C7RKY Epidemiology has had sensitivity methods for estimating potential impact of publication biases for decades: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publication_bias … -
@C7RKY I'm entirely confident that there isn't any scientific reason to doubt either the efficacy or high-level of safety for vaccines. -
@dbarthjones I'm entirely confident you're right. At least until the#CDCwhistleblower hits Congress anyway. But I'm equally confident > -
@dbarthjones there's no scientific reason to have confidence in them either, given the lack of transparency. Which is back to my 1st point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.