What AntiVax Gets Dangerously Wrong http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/health360/posts/2015/02/06-measles-vaccines-mmr-herd-immunity-antivaxxers-patel#.VNo8VbiP18c.twitter … "w/ issue as important as vaccines, we can't afford political warfare" @kavitapmd
-
-
Replying to @dbarthjones
.
@dbarthjones@kavitapmd 1 thing antiVaxers don't get wrong: if 50% studies go selectively unpublished, what remains is in no way 'science'.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dbarthjones
@dbarthjones The burden of proof is not on me. I'm not claiming vaccines are safe. Any citation showing 100% of vaccine studies published?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dbarthjones
@dbarthjones Hang on a minute...this says 50% studies go selectively unpublished http://www.alltrials.net/ and it doesn't exclude vaccines. >2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
“
@C7RKY: Says 50% studies go selectively unpublished -> http://www.alltrials.net/ & it doesn't exclude vaccines” Some %(?) probably missing 1/N2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@dbarthjones This piece seems to confirm 50% figure, if that helps? >
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jan/03/drug-firms-information-clinical-trials …
I'm a fan of science. But this isn't science.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.