What AntiVax Gets Dangerously Wrong http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/health360/posts/2015/02/06-measles-vaccines-mmr-herd-immunity-antivaxxers-patel#.VNo8VbiP18c.twitter … "w/ issue as important as vaccines, we can't afford political warfare" @kavitapmd
-
-
@C7RKY Doubtful supposition - Your supporting citation(s) showing 50% of vaccine clinical trials/studies have been selectively unpublished? -
@dbarthjones The burden of proof is not on me. I'm not claiming vaccines are safe. Any citation showing 100% of vaccine studies published? -
@C7RKY I think we're done then if you're going to just make up #'s & assert it's my job to prove you wrong b/c that's not science either ;-) -
@dbarthjones Hang on a minute...this says 50% studies go selectively unpublished http://www.alltrials.net/ and it doesn't exclude vaccines. > -
“
@C7RKY: Says 50% studies go selectively unpublished -> http://www.alltrials.net/ & it doesn't exclude vaccines” Some %(?) probably missing 1/N -
@C7RKY But N's for unpublished studies usually much smaller. For example, it would take huge amount of missing evidence to offset this.. 2/N -
@C7RKY ...reference for vaccine meta-analysis including > 1.25 million observations. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X14006367 … 3/N -
@dbarthjones Well firstly, this grabbed my attention: "Disagreement was resolved by consensus with another author" But more importantly, > - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.