@WTBDavidG problems Enough to make a man go looking, put it that way. I expected to find science underpinning medical advice, but I didn't.
@WTBDavidG a judgement call based upon flawed anecdotal material, or flawed scientific material? All I know is measels kills 1:5000, but >
-
-
@WTBDavidG you have to catch it first - whatever those odds are. That's a slim chance. I then have to weigh that against the slim chance > -
@WTBDavidG the vaccine may cause a life changing (for EVERYONE) injury.But there's guaranteed exposure to the vaccine this way. It's a > -
@WTBDavidG question of relative risks for me, whichever way I turn. The disease, or the vaccine. But I find the suggestion that those who > -
@WTBDavidG wish to retain the right to decide against vaccination would 'rather have dead children' to be utterly offensive. This position > -
@WTBDavidG is rarely adopted out of anything other than the instinct to protect our kids & a realisation that we're not told both sides. -
@WTBDavidG Sorry for long/slow reply. Over & out. ;-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.