@WTBDavidG you could easily label me 'anti-vacc', tho I've always vaccd myself & my kids up to 4yrs ago. That all changed after my son's MMR
@WTBDavidG reason the vaccine court was set up in the US >
http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/vaccine-programoffice-special-masters …
Thousands are compensated for the damage they cause. >
-
-
@WTBDavidG We even have recognition of it here in the UK > https://www.gov.uk/vaccine-damage-payment/overview … But all in exchange for immunity for big pharma. Nice. > -
@WTBDavidG There was even a case in the US conceded by gov experts & $millions paid out for case linking autism. Evidence was court sealed > -
@WTBDavidG at the request of gov. I thought science demanded transparency? That's what makes it science, no? So now I'm left trying to make> -
@WTBDavidG a judgement call based upon flawed anecdotal material, or flawed scientific material? All I know is measels kills 1:5000, but > -
@WTBDavidG you have to catch it first - whatever those odds are. That's a slim chance. I then have to weigh that against the slim chance > -
@WTBDavidG the vaccine may cause a life changing (for EVERYONE) injury.But there's guaranteed exposure to the vaccine this way. It's a > -
@WTBDavidG question of relative risks for me, whichever way I turn. The disease, or the vaccine. But I find the suggestion that those who > -
@WTBDavidG wish to retain the right to decide against vaccination would 'rather have dead children' to be utterly offensive. This position > -
@WTBDavidG is rarely adopted out of anything other than the instinct to protect our kids & a realisation that we're not told both sides. -
@WTBDavidG Sorry for long/slow reply. Over & out. ;-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.