See the letter from lawyers which Prince Andrew refused to accept receipt of, requesting his voluntary co-operation > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2920763/Swear-oath-innocent-lawyers-sex-slave-tell-Prince-Andrew-growing-pressure-testify-rejecting-letter-asking-voluntary-operation.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailUK …
-
-
@C7RKY Predictably they've managed to get themselves exempt from the FoI Act -
@reggaecrisp1 Who has Chris? FedEx, or somebody else? -
@C7RKY The Royal Family. -
@reggaecrisp1 Oh..of course. Sorry. So simple when you can see it, eh? :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY I note they threaten summons if he doesn't play nice... -
@theedwardian81 Is such a thing really feasible? With a member of the royal family & the complication of trans-Atlantic legal wrangles? -
@C7RKY Worth asking the grown up lawyers on here if technically power exists. Wouldn't be used, as you say. -
@theedwardian81 Grown up lawyers? Ha! I'm sure you've retained more than enough. Untouchable, springs to mind re the Prince. Whatever exists
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY@StarSparkle_UK There's always the nicely inflexible US/UK extradition rules May as well put stamps on him now & wait for parcelforce -
@mr_ceebs@StarSparkle_UK Haha! If he didn't almost certainly know more than enough to cause trouble across the pond, I'd say you were right
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY > methinks one is
serves him right. No sympathy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.