@IanMcFadyen1966 @WillBlackWriter very fed up of the perpetual crap they make people endure while professing to be here for the people
-
-
Replying to @AngrybriTony
@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter Not a bad meeting .Looks like Holyrood are not wanting to copy Westminster mistakes http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/home-news/child-abuse-victims-hail-major-step-forward-in-fight-for-justice.25708457 …3 replies 6 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @IanMcFadyen1966
@IanMcFadyen1966@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter What exactly is meant by an 'apology law' Ian?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter Removing liability by apologising1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IanMcFadyen1966
@IanMcFadyen1966@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter That simple? Is that something that survivors want? An apology in place of accountability?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter The apology doesn't detract from the liability1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IanMcFadyen1966
@IanMcFadyen1966@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter Just to be clear, when you say 'removing liability by apologising' - removing it from whom?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@IanMcFadyen1966@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter from the agency potentially liable?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MAMAAUK
@MAMAAUK@IanMcFadyen1966@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter I can understand the principle but what if they *are* liable? Does it let them off?2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@IanMcFadyen1966@AngrybriTony@WillBlackWriter not sure, no detail in the article.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@MAMAAUK @IanMcFadyen1966 @AngrybriTony @WillBlackWriter Where the devil resides...I'll keep an eye out for developments. Thanks. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.