-
-
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie That's great - thank you. Found this there too > http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/es-foi/documents/foidisclosure/con2023317.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@Cleverestcookie And I really must learn to spell thiomersal properly - might help with my search!! :-/4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie That assumes adverse events are recorded & analysed fully. I'm unconvinced of that & unimpressed with trial 'science' tbh.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
@Cleverestcookie Esp since seeing this > https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/493795081825316864 … I seek raw data rather than author's conclusions these days as a result.John Clarke added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@Cleverestcookie And that's not something I've seen in any of those links yet tbh. Plenty of official 'statements' but no data to strutinise2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie Last was the swine flu year I believe? But think it's still in others. 1st ingredient this yr was a 'suspected carcinogen'!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Cleverestcookie I do agree there are a no. of sources we should be concerned by. Personally, I try to avoid them all. Vaccinations included
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.