@amcunningham @bendean1979 In the usual sense as defined by GMC and Medical Act etc
-
-
Replying to @ShaunLintern
@ShaunLintern so practice was impaired in past but isnt now. The consultation spells out the shift from remediation.@bendean19792 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amcunningham
@amcunningham@bendean1979 most serious of cases there is a case for this accountability both in public and professional interests.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShaunLintern
@shaunlintern@amcunningham I still don't see case for this change, current system allows for fair FtP decision2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bendean1979
@bendean1979@amcunningham It does not. No matter how badly impaired their practise may have been at the time if now ok no sanction.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @ShaunLintern
@ShaunLintern it depends on how we define 'fair', doesn't it.@bendean19791 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amcunningham
@amcunningham@bendean1979 Indeed. I feel no sanction simply due to passage of time is wrong. If justified for other reasons by panel, fine4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @ShaunLintern
@ShaunLintern I think public trust GMC to ensure doctors are safe. I don't think punishment makes safer.@bendean19792 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @amcunningham
@amcunningham@ShaunLintern@bendean1979 Oh no we don't! Far from it. Most I know who've dealt with them, regard them as utterly corrupt tbh1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY you can reply to consultation@ShaunLintern@bendean1979pic.twitter.com/XtWDf2OYqb
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@amcunningham @ShaunLintern @bendean1979 Sorry...got pulled away. Thank you. Good to know.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.