@Cleverestcookie But how does one judge what's appropriate? Not all records are true. May look A-ok on the surface, but pt may say different
@Cleverestcookie It matters a whole lot, if the scanning doesn't take place at the time of signature, imho. Paper consent is open to abuse.
-
-
@C7RKY ok but what about the patient's copy? That could be corroborating or otherwise. No reason why electronic shouldn't be used as easy>> -
@Cleverestcookie That assumes pt gets their copy. In v large % of cases, they aren't given one. That much, I do know. Electronic is v easy > -
@Cleverestcookie yet if it's so easy, it begs the question; why do they miss it out? Even on the latest systems? >https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/498605784385994752 … -
@C7RKY incompetence in scoping need and delivering a fit for purpose system -
@Cleverestcookie Or....? -
@C7RKY well, I don't usually go for the conspiracy theory option. I usually find things are down to incompetence and people aren't clever. -
@Cleverestcookie Think you're viewing this situation through your own 'pure' lense, if I may say so Cathy. Not all are so pure. This, I know -
@Cleverestcookie And there's no theory, in respect of my own experience of conspiracy. Plenty of evidence I'm afraid... - 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY to set up. Usually have other templates already so just a case of making another. Would be potentially standard across sector.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.