I will admit that seeing our paper in The Lancet Psychiatry this morning has made me a very happy lady! http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366%2814%2970244-5/abstract …
@TheLancetPsych @Nannon_Phillips Can't see PDF but a few comments re your tweets:
Children can't consent, so their signature is irrelevant >
-
-
@TheLancetPsych@Nannon_Phillips Same comment re Head Teachers. So this was set up as an OPT-OUT scheme? Disclosed to parents how exactly? -
@C7RKY@Nannon_Phillips Relevant section of protocol is here.pic.twitter.com/3YYKT9pJsl
-
@TheLancetPsych@Nannon_Phillips Yes, was just reading that bit - thank you. Still haven't found the part that details the disclosures tho? -
@C7RKY@Nannon_Phillips I'm not clear what precisely you mean by "disclosures". As you see, parents written to with info & could opt out. -
@TheLancetPsych@Nannon_Phillips Yes, but I'd like to know precicely what that info said. Can't provide informed consent without the info. -
@TheLancetPsych Thank you. Think I shall. I'm VERY touchy on the subject of consent, but when it's opt-out & it's kids too..makes me twitch! - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.