@C7RKY @GavinLarner @elinlowri I think Gavin was surprised today by the overall and individual frailty of our acute medical inpatients
@elinlowri @doctorcaldwell @GavinLarner Oh, I see. Interesting/disturbing thought. But wouldn't doing so fly in the face of GMC guidelines?
-
-
@C7RKY@elinlowri@GavinLarner what to do when ethically I believe the GMC guidance is seriously flawed? Open up to the public+Get thinking! -
@doctorcaldwell@elinlowri@GavinLarner And risk the wrath of GMC? Not many do. Guidelines only seem to be taken seriously if HCPs speak up. -
@C7RKY@elinlowri IMO GMC should be there to deal with criminal Doctors, support addicts etc and to promote excellence not name+shame 1/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell@GavinLarner I think so, which is why I spend a lot of time on these discussions, but can almost feel discretionary. -
@elinlowri@doctorcaldwell@GavinLarner Not unlike GMC's guidelines overall then? That figures. What you describe can't be allowed to happen -
@C7RKY@doctorcaldwell@GavinLarner I think that all cardiac arrests should be investigated as SUI's - usually inappropriate or preventable. -
@elinlowri@C7RKY@GavinLarner in last month all our CPRs are now recorded onto Datix as in need of investigation :)@DatixDanCohen -
@doctorcaldwell@elinlowri@C7RKY@GavinLarner Evaluating all cardiac arrests, or near arrests makes sense though this is time intensive -
@DatixDanCohen@elinlowri@C7RKY@GavinLarner investigating ANY Datix report is hugely costly+time consuming, so must have valuable outcome -
@doctorcaldwell@elinlowri@C7RKY@GavinLarner Quite true but investigatng a random sample, age and risk adjusted might work. -
@DatixDanCohen@elinlowri@C7RKY@GavinLarner true in incidents of the same type sample of 3 indepth better for learning than sample of 300 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.