free link BMJ col; why doctors should not be legally required to discuss futile treatments like CPR with patients. : http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/bmj.g4180?ijkey=vWtsMd2L3jHzkhR&keytype=ref …
-
-
Replying to @mgtmccartney
@mgtmccartney@WhistlingDixie4 I have made a "Full ward care and DNACPR" sticker GMC is OK with my using it often without discussion with pt4 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @doctorcaldwell
@doctorcaldwell@mgtmccartney@WhistlingDixie4 I'm sorry? A sticker? Without discussion with the patient? Surely that's now unlawful? No?5 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@mgtmccartney@WhistlingDixie4 when pushed a true professional behaves ethically even if that means punishment under the law?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @doctorcaldwell
@doctorcaldwell@mgtmccartney@WhistlingDixie4 Not clear how telling pt compromises ethics? If your case is so strong, why not convince pt?3 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @doctorcaldwell
@doctorcaldwell@C7RKY But if this question were put 2 all patients, as standard, upon admission, wld become normalised & not so confusing?3 replies 1 retweet 1 like
@MatSilk @doctorcaldwell Maybe. But recognition that pt condition changes wd have to come with it. Triage to determine who dies is the fear.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.