@Amazonnewsmedia @robertBird5 Isn't it just? Pleasure. Given clinicians have sole custody of medical records, this is often the only defence
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
My question is,
@C7RKY@robertBird5 if#Panorama techniques aren’t seen as entrapment, why aren’t people using them more?#realitybites1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Amazonnewsmedia
@Amazonnewsmedia@C7RKY@robertBird5 very good point.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sjparis
@sjparis@Amazonnewsmedia@C7RKY because most people ‘trust’ their DR and NHS and dont realise till its too late :( I did originally2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robertBird5
@robertBird5@sjparis@Amazonnewsmedia Rob's right. Those of us who've been through it, know what we're up against. Most haven't a clue tho.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@robertBird5@sjparis do you think it could be seen as entrapment? "I'm guilty, do you think you can get me off?"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Amazonnewsmedia
@Amazonnewsmedia@robertBird5@sjparis Oh from reporter's perspective? Maybe actually. How to expose medical experts falsely defending docs?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@robertBird5@sjparis 2/2 surprised that posing as bent to expose bentness not generally seen as entrapment. Endless possibilities ..3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Amazonnewsmedia
@Amazonnewsmedia@robertBird5@sjparis I can see why, but is there not a public interest defence on many of these issues? You'd think so...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@robertBird5@sjparis yes, clearly it's in pub interest to be informed, justification is a question that can only get more pressing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Amazonnewsmedia @robertBird5 @sjparis When it's about expert witnesses who influence the outcome of court cases, nothing's of more interest
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.