@Innenwelttramp No. In line with all developmentals. Reaction to vaccine was immediate, prolongued & violent. Written off locally as a 'bug'
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@Innenwelttramp After 4 months of screaming, arching back in pain, & 20+ nappies/day, he 'emerged' what they now call severely autistic.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_lnnen_WT
@C7RKY know that children with ASD are very stimulus sensitive because of their special condition? They don't like to be undressed, bathed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_lnnen_WT
@C7RKY or even touched. Similar case in ADHD. Parents need special support to raise these demanding children.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_lnnen_WT
@Innenwelttramp Of course. Sensory issues are common complex & changing in ASD dx. Wasn't pesent pre-vaccine, so suspect damage as the cause
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@Innenwelttramp But my real issue is not that my view is seen as unscientific (I know it is) it's that pharma evidence is unscientific too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_lnnen_WT
@Innenwelttramp The fact that it claims there is 'scientific evidence' of safety, suggests otherwise tbh. What is peddled as science, is not
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@Innenwelttramp Clinical studies are rarely run for long enough/on a big enough sample anyway, but half are never published at all & even >
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Innenwelttramp then, positive studies are twice as likely to be published as negative ones? That's not any definition of science I know?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.