@C7RKY I didnt quite get you. Sorry! Was he in some way "special" before he had his MMR? You told me, he was perfectly healthy before.
@Innenwelttramp Clinical studies are rarely run for long enough/on a big enough sample anyway, but half are never published at all & even >
-
-
@Innenwelttramp then, positive studies are twice as likely to be published as negative ones? That's not any definition of science I know?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY You are right. That's the reason for the "All trials" initiative. Or for the book "Bad Pharma" / Ben Goldacre. But it doesnt follow -
@C7RKY that pharmacological studies, inventions & approaches are evil in general. -
@Innenwelttramp No, of course not. I would never suggest so. But I'd also never accept 'evidence' of safety/efficacy at face value any more
-
@Innenwelttramp What worried me more, was when I found 2 cases in USA where link between autism/MMR was conceded by gov expert, damages >
-
@Innenwelttramp >paid out in $millions, but the evidence was sealed by the court so can't be seen. Why? Hiding evidence concerns me greatly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.