You wait nearly a month for an FOI response, only to find there's still possible word-play where it matters
#caredatapic.twitter.com/8UqkLZtlwH
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
> By quoting an example, HSCIC can presume to limit subsequent text to being about 'Personal Confidential Data' ONLY - just the identifiers.
> This means crucially, that the phrase "then no data will be extracted", can be claimed to relate to 'Personal Confidential Data' only.
>So is this yet more trickery from HSCIC? Still don't believe this rules out most of our GP data flowing to HSCIC, even with a Type1 opt-out
@C7RKY Confuses me too. Why would a type 1 + 2 objection result in more data extracted than type 1 alone ? Or am I missing something ?
@arcjn1 That's because type 1 only keeps letting them share hospital records. But they need to ID you, to stop that, if type 2 also done.
@arcjn1 But key here is the word games around using an example, with PCD at its heart, to limit the scope of the reply - pure deception imho
@C7RKY Keep up the good fight! You can ask for clarifications, theres still six months before next attempt at a start date.
@C7RKY That's an i.e. not an e.g. in image; i.e. specifies the objection, it doesn't limit the result. But we're still awaiting reDirections
@medConfidential Differs from e.g. "in that completeness or near-completeness is suggested, rather than a small selection of examples"
>Wiki
@medConfidential The implication of such being that the remainder of the paragraph is limited by the i.e.? More to do...thanks though Phil.
@C7RKY Oh yes, plenty still to do. We ain't gonna let 'em sneak stuff through!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.