@KayFSheldon @clarercgp @theveindoc @RoyLilley agree. Rationalisation, not abolition
-
-
@C7RKY@KayFSheldon@clarercgp@theveindoc@RoyLilley I think it needs to be made to be joined up and fit for purpose -
@Cleverestcookie@KayFSheldon@clarercgp@theveindoc@RoyLilley I agree. There needs to be an overall review of medical regulation, imho. -
@C7RKY@KayFSheldon@clarercgp@theveindoc@RoyLilley outcome IME is that individuals suffer. This is unacceptable in a caring society. -
@Cleverestcookie@KayFSheldon@clarercgp@theveindoc@RoyLilley That's the outcome ime too. I wonder if self-limiting 'remits' widen cracks? -
@C7RKY@KayFSheldon@clarercgp@theveindoc@RoyLilley poor continuity and handover when bodies change. Gaps in cover etc etc -
@Cleverestcookie@KayFSheldon@clarercgp@theveindoc@RoyLilley Quite. Feels like someone split up a whole regulator, but kept the teeth. -
@C7RKY@Cleverestcookie@clarercgp@theveindoc@RoyLilley In fact there is more teeth now; what you want is individual redress. -
@KayFSheldon@Cleverestcookie@clarercgp@theveindoc@RoyLilley And you Kay, are now as guilty of misrepresenting my expectations as others. - 20 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.