@medConfidential Is this one of your #FOI requests? If not, plenty of interesting material http://ico.org.uk/about_us/how_we_comply/disclosure_log/201403 …
@tim2040 @bainesy1969 @medConfidential Looks like it got sent without waiting for their comments? Only glanced at Att 1 on phone so far tho.
-
-
@C7RKY@tim2040@medConfidential This seems to show ICO advising on content http://ico.org.uk/about_us/how_we_comply/disclosure_log/~/media/documents/disclosure_log/IRQ0529461g.pdf …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@tim2040@bainesy1969@medConfidential Jonathon Bangor Email, 23/8 states: "Given that mailings of materials have commenced today, it is > -
@tim2040@bainesy1969@medConfidential >regrettable that you are not now able to take any of our comments into account" What you were after? -
@c7rky@bainesy1969@medconfidential Actually, that might be the opposite. If NHS England ignored ICO, then ICO has clean hands. -
.
@tim2040@c7rky@bainesy1969@NHSEngland DID ignore#ICO, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmdISLDa5NQ … timecode 1:19 < ICO suggested letter not junk mail -
@medConfidential@NHSEngland ICO FoI reply shows that tkelsey told ICO EVERY patient would be contacted by GP and given chance to opt out! -
Could you give reference, please
@Snyberwiz There's a lot of scanned paperwork to wade through...@NHSEngland -
@medConfidential@NHSEngland Page 11 of attachment 1. Email from Jonathan Bamford to Siobhan Roberts 23 Aug 2013. Very unequivocal wording -
Wow
@Snyberwiz@arcjn1 That's a bit of a smoking gun! Source: http://ico.org.uk/about_us/how_we_comply/disclosure_log/201403 … Attachment 1, page 11#caredatapic.twitter.com/HLoMFKWFOq
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.